Physics-aware downsampling with deep learning for scalable flood modeling | Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (2024)

Supplemental Material

1. S.T. Arundel, C.M. Archuleta, L.A. Phillips, B.L. Roche, and E.W. Constance. 1-meter digital elevation model specification: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, 2015.Google ScholarCross Ref
2. World Meteorological Association et al. The global climate 2001–2010: A decade of climate extremes, summary report. Geneva, Switzerland: WMO, 16p, 2013.Google Scholar
3. Jimmy Lei Ba, Jamie Ryan Kiros, and Geoffrey E Hinton. Layer normalization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.06450, 2016.Google Scholar
4. Yohai Bar-Sinai, Stephan Hoyer, Jason Hickey, and Michael P. Brenner. Learning data driven discretizations for partial differential equations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116, 2019.Google Scholar
5. Zvika Ben-Haim, Vladimir Anisimov, Aaron Yonas, Varun Gulshan, Yusef Shafi, Stephan Hoyer, and Sella Nevo. Inundation Modeling in Data Scarce Regions. 2019.Google Scholar
6. Tianqi Chen, Bing Xu, Chiyuan Zhang, and Carlos Guestrin. Training deep nets with sublinear memory cost. arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.06174, 2016.Google Scholar
7. Gustavo A.M. De Almeida and Paul Bates. Applicability of the local inertial approximation of the shallow water equations to flood modeling. Water Resources Research, 49, 2013.Google Scholar
8. Gustavo AM de Almeida, Paul Bates, Jim E Freer, and Maxime Souvignet. Improving the stability of a simple formulation of the shallow water equations for 2-d flood modeling. Water Resources Research, 48(5), 2012.Google Scholar
9. Emmanuel De Bézenac, Arthur Pajot, and Patrick Gallinari. Deep learning for physical processes: Incorporating prior scientific knowledge. In 6th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2018 - Conference Track Proceedings, 2018.Google Scholar
10. Shannon Doocy, Amy Daniels, Catherine Packer, Anna Dick, and Thomas D Kirsch. The human impact of earthquakes: a historical review of events 1980-2009 and systematic literature review. PLoS currents, 5, 2013.Google Scholar
11. TJ Fewtrell, Paul David Bates, Matt Horritt, and NM Hunter. Evaluating the effect of scale in flood inundation modelling in urban environments. Hydrological Processes: An International Journal, 22(26):5107–5118, 2008.Google ScholarCross Ref
12. Stathi Fotiadis, Eduardo Pignatelli, Anil A Bharath, Mario Lino Valencia, Chris D Cantwell, and Amos Storkey. ICLR 2020 Workshop on Deep Learning and Differential Equations COMPARING RECURRENT AND CONVOLUTIONAL NEU-RAL NETWORKS FOR PREDICTING WAVE PROPAGATION. Technical report.Google Scholar
13. Gerry Galloway. Usa: flood management–mississippi river. WMO/GWP Associated Programme on Flood Management, 2004.Google Scholar
14. Pierre Gentine, Mike Pritchard, Stephan Rasp, Gael Reinaudi, and Galen Yacalis. Could machine learning break the convection parameterization deadlock? Geophysical Research Letters, 45(11):5742–5751, 2018.Google ScholarCross Ref
15. Daniel Greenfeld, Meirav Galun, Ron Kimmel, Irad Yavneh, and Ronen Basri. Learning to optimize multigrid PDE solvers. In 36th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2019, 2019.Google Scholar
16. Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 770–778, 2016.Google ScholarCross Ref
17. Philipp Holl, Vladlen Koltun, and Nils Thuerey. Learning to Control PDEs with Differentiable Physics. In 8th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2020, 2020.Google Scholar
18. Sergey Ioffe and Christian Szegedy. Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. In International conference on machine learning, pp. 448–456. PMLR, 2015.Google Scholar
19. Anuj Karpatne, Gowtham Atluri, James H fa*ghmous, Michael Steinbach, Arindam Banerjee, Auroop Ganguly, Shashi Shekhar, Nagiza Samatova, and Vipin Kumar. Theory-guided data science: A new paradigm for scientific discovery from data. IEEE Transactions on knowledge and data engineering, 29(10):2318–2331, 2017.Google ScholarDigital Library
20. Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014.Google Scholar
21. Dmitrii Kochkov, Jamie A Smith, Ayya Alieva, Qing Wang, Michael P Brenner, and Stephan Hoyer. Machine learning accelerated computational fluid dynamics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.01010, 2021.Google Scholar
22. Pijush K Kundu and Ira M Cohen. Fluid mechanics. 2002.Google Scholar
23. Randall J LeVeque and Randall J Leveque. Numerical methods for conservation laws, volume 132. Springer, 1992.Google ScholarCross Ref
24. Zichao Long, Yiping Lu, Xianzhong Ma, and Bin Dong. Pde-net: Learning pdes from data. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 3208–3216. PMLR, 2018.Google Scholar
25. World Health Organization et al. Global report on drowning: preventing a leading killer. World Health Organization, 2014.Google Scholar
26. P Peduzzi, U Deichmann, A Maskrey, FA Nadim, H Dao, B Chatenoux, C Herold, A Debono, G Giuliani, and S Kluser. Global disaster risk: patterns, trends and drivers. Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction, pp. 17–57, 2009.Google Scholar
27. Charles A Perry. Significant floods in the United States during the 20th century: USGS measures a century of floods. US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey, 2000.Google Scholar
28. Paul J Pilon. Guidelines for reducing flood losses. Technical report, United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR), 2002.Google Scholar
29. Maziar Raissi, Paris Perdikaris, and George Em Karniadakis. Physics informed deep learning (part i): Data-driven solutions of nonlinear partial differential equations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.10561, 2017.Google Scholar
30. Maziar Raissi, Paris Perdikaris, and George E Karniadakis. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. Journal of Computational Physics, 378:686–707, 2019.Google ScholarCross Ref
31. David Rogers and Vladimir Tsirkunov. Costs and benefits of early warning systems. Global assessment rep, 2011.Google Scholar
32. Ehsan Sharifi, B Saghafian, and R Steinacker. Downscaling satellite precipitation estimates with multiple linear regression, artificial neural networks, and spline interpolation techniques. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 124(2):789–805, 2019.Google ScholarCross Ref
33. Justin Sirignano and Konstantinos Spiliopoulos. Dgm: A deep learning algorithm for solving partial differential equations. Journal of computational physics, 375:1339–1364, 2018.Google Scholar
34. Jeffrey Mark Siskind and Barak A Pearlmutter. Divide-and-conquer checkpointing for arbitrary programs with no user annotation. Optimization Methods and Software, 33(4-6):1288–1330, 2018.Google ScholarCross Ref
35. Vincent Sitzmann, Julien Martel, Alexander Bergman, David Lindell, and Gordon Wetzstein. Implicit neural representations with periodic activation functions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 2020.Google Scholar
36. Prashant K Srivastava, Dawei Han, Miguel Rico Ramirez, and Tanvir Islam. Machine learning techniques for downscaling smos satellite soil moisture using modis land surface temperature for hydrological application. Water resources management, 27(8):3127–3144, 2013.Google Scholar
37. Carlo Tomasi and Roberto Manduchi. Bilateral filtering for gray and color images. In Sixth international conference on computer vision (IEEE Cat. No. 98CH36271), pp. 839–846. IEEE, 1998.Google Scholar
38. Kiwon Um, Robert Brand, Philipp Holl, Nils Thuerey, et al. Solver-in-the-loop: Learning from differentiable physics to interact with iterative pde-solvers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.00016, 2020.Google Scholar
39. CRED UNISDR et al. The human cost of natural disasters: A global perspective. 2015.Google Scholar
40. Thomas Vandal, Evan Kodra, Sangram Ganguly, Andrew Michaelis, Ramakrishna Nemani, and Auroop R Ganguly. Deepsd: Generating high resolution climate change projections through single image super-resolution. In Proceedings of the 23rd acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, pp. 1663–1672, 2017.Google ScholarDigital Library
41. Cornelis Boudewijn Vreugdenhil. Numerical methods for shallow-water flow, volume 13. Springer Science & Business Media, 1994.Google ScholarCross Ref
42. Jared Willard, Xiaowei Jia, Shaoming Xu, Michael Steinbach, and Vipin Kumar. Integrating physics-based modeling with machine learning: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.04919, 2020.Google Scholar
43. Oliver E. J. Wing, Paul D. Bates, Jeffrey C. Neal, Christopher C. Sampson, Andrew M. Smith, Niall Quinn, Iuliia Shustikova, Alessio Domeneghetti, Daniel W. Gilles, Radoslaw Goska, and Witold F. Krajewski. A New Automated Method for Improved Flood Defense Representation in Large-Scale Hydraulic Models. Water Resources Research, 2019.Google ScholarCross Ref
44. Dapeng Yu and Stuart N Lane. Urban fluvial flood modelling using a two-dimensional diffusion-wave treatment, part 1: mesh resolution effects. Hydrological Processes: An International Journal, 20(7):1541–1565, 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref

• GIS Based Urban Flood Inundation Modeling

  GCIS '10: Proceedings of the 2010 Second WRI Global Congress on Intelligent Systems - Volume 02

  Flooding is a complex process affected by many factors in which the flood discharge characteristics and the topography of the inundated region are of great importance. This study aimed at the development of a manageable method for flood inundation ...

  Read More

• Determination of flood risk

  This paper combines hydrological and flood models for the purpose of estimating surface and peak flow rates from precipitation storm events occurred in basins of Rize province located in northern Turkey, receiving highest annual average precipitation ...

  Read More

• River cross-section extraction from the ASTER global DEM for flood modeling

  An approach to generate river cross-sections from the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer Global Digital Elevation Model (ASTER GDEM) is discussed. The low resolution and the inadequate vertical accuracy of such global data ...

  Read More